Engine tune - Page 2 - Lincoln MKC Forum
 4Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 32 Old 04-02-2016, 07:49 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
The reason why I ask is a I nicely modded 05 gto. As well, and was thinking that I could do a computer tune to see if Ford was holding something back on this engine. I look at the focus and see what it is putting out and wonder if My little 2.0 could just with a computer tune find me another 15hp 8-9lbft of torque in drive alone. Just a thought but glad to see the responses thank you everyone. I drive in sport, but will us high test Gas more often!!!
Justin Phillips is offline  
post #12 of 32 Old 04-02-2016, 11:32 AM
Senior Member
 
5.0 Candy REDCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Nice! a bunch of guys with new 2015 Mustangs sporting eco boost engines have already been modding them according to ALLFORDMUSTANGS....some post very positive comments about the ProCal uploads...others are going the different route with bolt ons....nice to know the warranty remains intact with the ProCal,although I'd like to read what they consider still under warranty.
I saw a few that have bolted bigger turbo's, and are pushing between 6-8 lbs of boost!....some guy in Arizona went with a 50 trim Garret turbo and supporting mods,I would imagine higher cycle injectors and tweaked the fuel maps....he did not get into a lot of detail but according to him,it definitely woke her up! LOL.

2016 MKC, Reserve. White Platinum Met Tri-coat.
Leather ebony interior.
Climate package
Technology package
2.3L GTDI ecoboost.
6-speed select SHIFT auto trans.
20" premium painted Alum wheels.
Equipment Group 300A.
Silver rust protection.
Xzilon exterior paint protection.
Weather Tech front and rear liners ....the rest is ALL Lincoln.
5.0 Candy REDCS is offline  
post #13 of 32 Old 04-02-2016, 01:34 PM
Member
 
TheReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Mobile, Al.
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Phillips View Post
The reason why I ask is a I nicely modded 05 gto. As well, and was thinking that I could do a computer tune to see if Ford was holding something back on this engine. I look at the focus and see what it is putting out and wonder if My little 2.0 could just with a computer tune find me another 15hp 8-9lbft of torque in drive alone. Just a thought but glad to see the responses thank you everyone. I drive in sport, but will us high test Gas more often!!!
There's at least 40 hp that can be easily and safely extracted from that little 2.0.
TheReaper is offline  
 
post #14 of 32 Old 04-02-2016, 07:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Near Chicago IL
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
But will the transmission take the extra torque? I think the 2.3 transmission is beefed up a bit from the 2.0.

2016 MKC - August 2015 build
Platinum White - Wht Sands/Espresso
Reserve 300 AWD
2.3 Ecoboost
Sync 3
20" Wheels
Technology Package
Climate Package
All Weather Floor Mats
Premium Reversible Cargo Mat
blankster is online now  
post #15 of 32 Old 04-03-2016, 09:05 AM
Senior Member
 
5.0 Candy REDCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
I was thinking the same thing blankster....seems the weakest part is the first to give out.

2016 MKC, Reserve. White Platinum Met Tri-coat.
Leather ebony interior.
Climate package
Technology package
2.3L GTDI ecoboost.
6-speed select SHIFT auto trans.
20" premium painted Alum wheels.
Equipment Group 300A.
Silver rust protection.
Xzilon exterior paint protection.
Weather Tech front and rear liners ....the rest is ALL Lincoln.
5.0 Candy REDCS is offline  
post #16 of 32 Old 04-08-2016, 11:10 PM
Member
 
lenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnite cruiser View Post
A quick look around the fanboy sites of the MKC's cousin car, the 2.0 Titinium Escape, and I see there are 'tuner chips' out there in the market right now. Of course you should have a detailed discussion with the vendor to confirm its applicability to the MKC.
If you have never had a chip, understand that the fresh programming on there comes with trade-offs. Anybody who says they get both power AND economy gains is full of it. Ford/Lincoln does know what it is doing but necessarily has to set parameters for the mass market.
Depending how radical the performance profile is and how it makes the engine do more is important. For instance, moving up the redline can spin the engine accessories (alternator, AC compressor) faster than they are designed and kill bearing life on them. (I had an '89 SHO that went through this) Underdrive pulleys can take care of that, but how far do you want to go (nitrous? different waste gates on turbo?) before swapping for that 2.3 MKC makes sense.
I totally agree with trying out higher octane fuel and the Sport mode as a first round.
Supposedly the MKC does some 'learning' about how we like to drive and tunes parameters itself to some degree..........so drive it often like you stole it.:-)
I don't know about "chips", but tuners know how to get the efficiency out of specific engine. This enhances both power and economy. Usually car manufacturers install "safe" tunes(or programs) to account for the various types of drivers. My 06 mustang GT has gone through the gambit of cold air kits, under drive pullies, delete plates, comp cams stage 2 VSR, 373 gears and 410 gears and now sports a 530 hp(flywheel) Saleen VI supercharger. Each stage added hp and if you driver it normally - increased mileage. Initially when first purchased with 331 gears car averaged about 24 mpg (us gallons).
Brenspeed tune and C & L cold air kit brought it up to 27 mpg. After cams and gear changes it brought it down to about 24 mpg - like new stock. Now with supercharger if I drive normally on highway I can get about 25 mpg. Get your foot into it - different story, but power is exhilarating. Never did bring up the redline so it doesn't spin faster - just gets up there quicker. Just my experience in the past 10 years with this car. If a tune becomes available for my 2015 MKC I would probably get an SCT loader and tune for it.
mrmikesdeuce likes this.

Last edited by lenko; 04-08-2016 at 11:15 PM.
lenko is offline  
post #17 of 32 Old 04-09-2016, 09:53 AM
Senior Member
 
5.0 Candy REDCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Amen Lanko....power is addictive to say the least! lol....the 3:73 gears are awesome on mine as well....when I added the Kenny Bell SC and under drive pullies it completely changed the game....normal driving without getting deep into boost gives me better fuel mileage!

2016 MKC, Reserve. White Platinum Met Tri-coat.
Leather ebony interior.
Climate package
Technology package
2.3L GTDI ecoboost.
6-speed select SHIFT auto trans.
20" premium painted Alum wheels.
Equipment Group 300A.
Silver rust protection.
Xzilon exterior paint protection.
Weather Tech front and rear liners ....the rest is ALL Lincoln.
5.0 Candy REDCS is offline  
post #18 of 32 Old 03-12-2017, 10:52 AM
Senior Member
 
mrmikesdeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Syracuse, NY 13219
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5.0 Candy REDCS View Post
^....agreed, night and day difference!...premium is a higher octane gas,MKC seems to really like it,regular does the job, but premium really wakes it up!
My '14 Escape 2.0 was factory rated at 240 HP. That rating is achieved with 93 octane gas. When running 87 octane, the HP drops to 231. I'm sure the 2.3 rating of 285 HP is achieved with 93 octane also. I'm sure it is less with 87 octane. These engines have variable timing and will run fine on either fuel, but for the advertised HP, the higher octane is required.

2017 MKC Reserve AWD
White platinum w/Hazelnut leather interior
2.3L Ecoboost
Equipment group 300A
Technology Package (Sync 3 v3.0)
Climate package
18" Wheels

Built 1/27/17
mrmikesdeuce is offline  
post #19 of 32 Old 05-30-2017, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
If you thinksits faster, good for you. As stated above, tranny shifting is the limiter on this vehicle. Feel free to contribute to the gas giants for that extra .1 sec

2016 Range Rover Sport HSE
2015 Lincoln MKC Reserve 2.3 AWD
2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata GTPRHT
2011 Lotus Evora S
2008 Isuzu Ascender LTD
ddsski is offline  
post #20 of 32 Old 11-08-2017, 06:39 PM
Member
 
lenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankster View Post
But will the transmission take the extra torque? I think the 2.3 transmission is beefed up a bit from the 2.0.
Same transmission, no difference. This small power increase doesn't justify a beefed up transmission and is unnecessary. A few hundred more HP - different story.

Last edited by lenko; 11-08-2017 at 06:43 PM.
lenko is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome