Mpg - Lincoln MKC Forum
 2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 25 Old 01-29-2014, 12:38 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Mpg

Has anyone seen the MPG on the MKC?
rgraham387 is offline  
post #2 of 25 Old 01-29-2014, 03:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
I haven't seen anything reported, waiting on EPA numbers.



DeMarco is offline  
post #3 of 25 Old 02-04-2014, 01:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Nothing official but rumor has it that the MKC should come in somewhere in the low-twenties for a combined fuel economy rating. That is for the MKC's base 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. There isn't much to go off of for the 2.3-liter turbocharged in-line four.



Hunter090 is offline  
 
post #4 of 25 Old 02-05-2014, 03:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
low 20's for an SUV like this isn't too bad. It will still help to see real world numbers to get some real numbers from a range of people in different parts of the U.S.



DeMarco is offline  
post #5 of 25 Old 02-05-2014, 04:10 PM
Senior Member
 
humpty dumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
a good place to start is looking at the Escape, 2012's and '13's are averaging out 22-23 mpg. 2013 Ford Escape MPG Reports | Fuelly
humpty dumpty is offline  
post #6 of 25 Old 02-05-2014, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Its not bad but its also not amazing. I was expecting a bit more from the EcoBoost engine to be honest. Is the hybrid more impressive?



Hunter090 is offline  
post #7 of 25 Old 02-06-2014, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
 
humpty dumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter090 View Post
Its not bad but its also not amazing. I was expecting a bit more from the EcoBoost engine to be honest. Is the hybrid more impressive?
there is no Escape Hybrid... you do have to be careful when looking at Escape numbers however as the 2.0L Ecoboost is top of the range engine, and mized in with the 1.6 Eco and the 2.5 natural.
humpty dumpty is offline  
post #8 of 25 Old 02-06-2014, 01:50 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Mpg

I have a 2011 MKX, 3.7L 2WD. Have not touched the MPG average since it was purchased. The average for highway and city is 24.2. therefore, i would expect the MKC, smaller and lighter and assumable more efficient engine, to be more that 24.2.
rgraham387 is offline  
post #9 of 25 Old 02-06-2014, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Have you been trying to drive it in a way that would get you the best possible MPG's?



DeMarco is offline  
post #10 of 25 Old 02-06-2014, 07:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
yep just look at 2013 Ford Escape mileage for the 2.0L.

The 2.3L is unknown at this point. I'm sure Mustang buyers want to know as well.
golfball is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome