There's no fixed relationship between ethanol content and net octane at the pump - it all depends on the total blend formula of the specific fuel in question..... I thought that 88 octane had 15%? Maybe they put the wrong label?
In this case we're talking about E-15, which in my area is also 88 Octane.There's no fixed relationship between ethanol content and net octane at the pump - it all depends on the total blend formula of the specific fuel in question.
In my market area 87 through 93 octane are all widely available with no more than 10% ethanol content.
There's no fixed relationship between ethanol content and net octane at the pump - it all depends on the total blend formula of the specific fuel in question.
In my market area 87 through 93 octane are all widely available with no more than 10% ethanol content.
Yeah, I've seen that all over since the mid 2000's. Read about the 88 octane gas here. Notice how they say, "88 Octane gasoline is a newer gasoline blend that across Minnesota and other states. It consists of 85% gasoline and 15% ethanol, so it is sometimes called E15.". So I'm wondering if there is two different 88 octane gases going around. One with no more than 10% and the other 15%. Or is the 88 octane at my pump mislabeled as 10% when it's really 15%? I tried it and didn't notice any decrease in fuel economy from any excess ethanol, so I'm wondering if it's truly 10%. The way the article is writing about it, all the new 88 octane fuels coming out have 15% ethanol. If I didn't have that E85 sticker on my fuel tank, I'd be worried.
Each vehicle responds to fuels differently depending on how they are tuned, the compression ratio and having a turbo or not. I had a Camaro back in the day and if I ever put 89 octane in it, it would ping like crazy. I always had to keep 93 in it.I'm willing to bet that the previous fuel on that pump was "Mid-Grade" (89 Octane) and they didn't remove the sticker on the pump, since E15 has 15% ethanol on purpose.
@Buckeye - Thanks. Threads like this do tend to get off the rails a bit. I have used 91 (E0) gas in the MKC and it was MUCH better, both performance and MPG. It was in a boating community and on the way back home, we averaged (per the trip computer) 29.6 MPG with an average speed of 67mph (includes stops). Car ran smooth. The difference is crazy. I don't get that kind of return on 93 (E10) fuel which is why I was curious about this 88 (E15). I do notice that on 87 (10) the power pulls way back after 4500, on 91 and 93 it pulls harder to redline. Anyway, maybe I'll throw a tank of it in there... See what happens.