Joined
·
8 Posts
Has anyone seen the MPG on the MKC?
there is no Escape Hybrid... you do have to be careful when looking at Escape numbers however as the 2.0L Ecoboost is top of the range engine, and mized in with the 1.6 Eco and the 2.5 natural.Its not bad but its also not amazing. I was expecting a bit more from the EcoBoost engine to be honest. Is the hybrid more impressive?
that will be a must. i wonder how much better MPG's will be in the mustang than in the Escape, since the Mustang should be lighter.yep just look at 2013 Ford Escape mileage for the 2.0L.
The 2.3L is unknown at this point. I'm sure Mustang buyers want to know as well.
that is very true.but where is the fun in that
thats why i believe in real world mileage claims like on fuelly.com over the estimated ones. estimated mileage is in ideal perfect conditions with the most ideal type of driving.
none of those criteria fit the bill for me.
but the mustang is tuned for over 300 ponies vs MKC's 275. Plus the mustang is a tad more performance orientedthat will be a must. i wonder how much better MPG's will be in the mustang than in the Escape, since the Mustang should be lighter.
id imagine it isnt too hard to tune the mustang to 300hp from 275but the mustang is tuned for over 300 ponies vs MKC's 275. Plus the mustang is a tad more performance oriented![]()