My guess is:
- Revised fascia and tail lamps, Wheels
- Adaptive cruise with stop and go
- Active braking
- Front camera
- Perhaps a 9 speed transmission
- Modest HP/torque boost on the 2.3 (if the 9 speed can take it)
The vehicle is already available it is called an MKX, except for the 9 speed transHere is my wish list for the refreshed 2019 MKC
⁃ Adaptive cruise with stop and go
⁃ 9 speed transmission
⁃ HD rear view mirror
⁃ 360 Camera
⁃ Heads up display
⁃ Active braking
⁃ Multi contour seat
You're very close, blankster. I just went to a focus group thing where we compared the upcoming MKC (2019? 2020? - they didn't say) with 4 current competitors. While I can't say too much or too specifically, because we had to sign NDAs of course, I think I can safely say, think "mini-2018 Navigator"...inside and out.
Except that not everyone needs or wants an MKX size! It's like comparing a Macan vs a Cayenne. There are people who still prefer compact vehicles with better options without needing to go BIGGER in size. Also, compact cars are more fun to drive! Plus, the regular Equinox has most of the options already.The vehicle is already available it is called an MKX, except for the 9 speed trans
I drove the MKX as a service loaner while my MKC was in for service. It just felt too big. The MKC is the perfect size for us!
Nope. Was definitely a next-generation MKC. From what I've heard the new "Aviator" will be based on the Explorer and what we saw, sat in, etc. was not that big or that class of vehicle. The spec sheet was impressive, though, and close to your list...including a new "greener" powertrain option.Lincoln is also bringing an Aviator to market soon (smaller Navigator) could that be what you saw?
Nope. Was definitely a next-generation MKC. From what I've heard the new "Aviator" will be based on the Explorer and what we saw, sat in, etc. was not that big or that class of vehicle. The spec sheet was impressive, though, and close to your list...including a new "greener" powertrain option.
I would not call this a mid-cycle refresh. The exterior and interior were completely different from the current model, not just swapping in the new corporate grill and some revised taillights, etc. It also seemed to be a bit larger with a little more rear seat room. I remember going to a similar one a few years ago for the MKX. The vehicle they showed us turned out to indeed be the current MKX in production form; i.e., a next-gen, not a MCR.Interesting - I see they are testing a "greener" Escape so that could/would include the MKC. Now the question is was it the 2019 which is a MCR (mid-cycle refresh) or the next generation as stated i.e. new platform?
I would not call this a mid-cycle refresh. The exterior and interior were completely different from the current model, not just swapping in the new corporate grill and some revised taillights, etc. It also seemed to be a bit larger with a little more rear seat room. I remember going to a similar one a few years ago for the MKX. The vehicle they showed us turned out to indeed be the current MKX in production form; i.e., a next-gen, not a MCR.
View attachment 4898
This information is from Auto News a while ago. It shows an MKC redesign in 2018. Probably as a 2019 model?
Okay, why are we in HP wars again?New Audi Q5 has a 252 hp (2.0T) to a 354 hp SQ5 (3.0T V6).
New BMW X3 goes from 252 hp (2.0T) to a M40i 355 hp (3.0TT V6).
Mercedes-Benz offers a 241 hp (2.0T), a 362 hp GLC43 (3.0TT V6), and 469 hp GLC63 (4.0TT V8) :devil
Volvo XC60: 250 hp, 316 hp, and 400 hp.
Jaguar F-Pace: 247 hp, 296 hp, 340 hp, and 380 hp.
Porsche Macan: 252 hp, 340 hp, 360 hp, 400 hp, and 440 hp :devil
Current Lincoln MKC: 240 hp, and 285 hp, hey!
"New" Lincoln MKC:... ... ... (= you better make it right)
It's important so you can get to Starbucks a second or two faster. Or perhaps to the next stoplight a second or two faster. At some point HP means nothing as you practically can't benefit from it and most likely won't even notice it. I'm happy with my 2.0t with a 0-60 in about 6.5 sec which is about the same as the 2.3 engine despite the 2.3 having more HP.Okay, why are we in HP wars again?
Where is our hybrid Lincoln?
No rational business need for 4 engine offerings. I say one hybrid, a mid range 250hp or so 2.0, and yes a 300+ hp 'halo' mill for happy leadfoots:wink